Silence As A Status Symbol

Modern working and private life should be redesigned in such a way that the ability to disconnect is a fundamental human right and not just a status symbol for the privileged.

Silence As A Status Symbol
A disconnection from work represents progress with an evolved understanding of wellbeing. Photo: © Jens Koester, 2026

The New Way Being Absent

We have reached a very special moment in the history of technology. For the first time, absence is more valuable than presence. Consider what this means: in a world where ubiquitous connectivity has been achieved, where AI-optimized feeds and real-time collaboration tools define our daily lives and work, the new dimension of luxury is not about having more. It's about being disconnected and having less.

Luxury hotels now market themselves with the promise that no mobile devices are allowed, and wellness retreats confiscate cell phones at the door. The mindset is shifting away from “always-available prestige” to something referred to as “curated unavailability.”

When connectivity was scarce, access was power. To have a phone, an internet connection, a place in the network—these were marks of status. Now that connectivity is ubiquitous, the logic has inverted. Power is no longer measured by your ability to join the network, but by your ability to leave it without penalty.

The Big Exhaustion

We are living through a decade of hyper-optimization: algorithmic feeds that learn your dopamine triggers, messaging stacks embedded in every layer of work, AI-driven tools that quietly discipline your attention and response times. The default state of modern professional life is continuous availability. The machine hums along, and you are expected to hum with it.

Employers embed cloud platforms that assume you’re never truly off the clock. There is no “closing time” for Slack. There is no boundary between “work hours” and “life hours” when your inbox lives in your pocket. The system creates a situation in which it is functionally impossible for most people to disconnect—not because the technology does not allow it, but because our social norms and the expectations of our superiors are formulated in this way.

But if we look closely, we can see that the luxury market for silence products does not offer a solution to this problem. It is a workaround for those who can afford it.

The wealthy outsource the regulation of their own attention to high-end environments: remote lodges, analog luxury resorts where algorithms cannot reach. They purchase, at premium prices, what should be a basic condition for every human existence. The old marketing and sales manual, created in the 1980s and digitized in the 1990s, still works. This raises the question of why we always put so much effort into marketing and charge high prices for something as basic as temporary unavailability. And meanwhile, the system that creates the need for this escape remains structurally untouched.

The Responsibility of The Individual

The narrative around these luxury offerings frames disconnection as “enlightened self-care” and “personal resilience.” You are told that if you’re burned out by constant connectivity, the solution is to invest in yourself and pay for a retreat, to book a room with no Wi-Fi, to hire someone to manage your digital absence.

This shifts responsibility from the system to the individual. It takes a collective problem—the fact that our economy now runs on the exploitation of human attention—and repackages it as a personal failing. If you cannot afford to buy silence, it seems to be your individual problem to solve. The wealthy escape to their analog sanctuaries, return refreshed, and then continue to demand instantaneous access from everyone who cannot afford that same exit.

Most people have to put up with the cognitive strain of constant interruptions, not because they lack discipline, but because the alternative would be a job loss.

Disconnection as A Scarce Asset

Even when you celebrate silent retreats and detox packages as evidence of a company’s care for employee wellbeing, and at the same time KPIs, communication architectures, and implicit expectations all assume 24/7 latent responsiveness, you create the “solution” to a problem that requires leaving the system rather than changing it.

The real innovation would not be more exquisitely curated silence at the edges. It would be a deliberate reduction of compulsory connectivity in the core operating model of work and commerce. It would be labor laws that recognize the right to ignore messages. It would be organizations designed around the human scale rather than algorithmic efficiency. It would accept the needs of young mothers and fathers to spent time with their newborns at 4pm without returning to the office at 6pm for a meeting.

The Market Opportunity of No Connection

The question of how work affects our overall well-being has been debated for a long time. We have now reached a point where AI agents are able to reduce disruptive factors and support every workplace by automating tasks, giving not only CEOs but everyone more time for their personal well-being or a quiet break.

Letting an AI agent or robot do your work is a matter of trust and technological advancement. These machines must be developed to the point where they can perform any task assigned to them. AI is not only a huge market opportunity for startups developing robots and the associated software, but also a way to satisfy people's deep need to switch off, which goes beyond high-end wellness hotels.

Modern working and private life should be redesigned so that the ability to disconnect is a fundamental human right and not just a status symbol for the privileged. By taking this human right into account and developing powerful AI services and products, we are creating a new way of organizing work, attention, and time.

Next time, before booking an expensive hotel that claims to be the perfect silent escape, ask yourself: What does it mean to purchase silence in a world where silence should never have been for sale?


Jens Koester is a strategic advisor focused on the structural friction between exponential technology and the enduring patterns of human culture. Through The Human Datum, he provides the intellectual architecture and foresight necessary for leaders to navigate the AI-driven decade with clarity and intentionality.

Share this reflection: LinkedIn X